OK, first of all here's the news:
White House says first lady’s image is being used without her permission in new PETA anti-fur ad.Here's the reminder:
Barack Obama's image was used without his permission in pro-Proposition 8 ads. (For those who don't recall, Prop 8 was the anti-gay measure that passed in California in 2008.)
The difference? This time, the Obama family is crying foul.
For the record, Michelle Obama
is anti-fur. And for the record, Obama's official stance was
against Prop 8.
So when an Obama's views are correctly portrayed in an anti-fur ad, the family sees the need to speak out, but when an Obama's views are incorrectly portrayed in an anti-gay ad, they keep mum?
Anyone out there still think Obama is actually pro-gay?